Einstein's Theory of Relativity faced opposition from over a hundred scholars, largely due to anti-Semitic sentiments rather than scientific grounds. Einstein's response encapsulated the essence of scientific thinking:

"A single valid scientific objection would suffice to disprove me."

This highlights that in science, quality of evidence trumps quantity of arguments.

Today's flat Earth believers exemplify how personal beliefs can clash with scientific facts. Despite their numerous arguments, none withstand scientific scrutiny, often stemming from observational biases and logical fallacies. Our everyday perception of a stationary, flat Earth contrasts sharply with the scientific reality of a rotating, spherical planet.

The Theory of Evolution faces similar challenges. Its vast timescale conflicts with many personal worldviews, leading to objections based on belief rather than scientific merit. However, scientific theories aren't validated or invalidated by personal opinions.

Einstein's relativity would have been discredited by the multitude of books written against it in the 20th century. Instead, scientific theories stand or fall based on empirical evidence and rigorous methodology, not on popular opinions or individual acceptance.